Java 23 Is Here, but Stream API’s filter Still Lags Behind: A Fresh Take

-
Java 23: Stream.filter Misses Performance Optimization

With the release of Java 23, developers are excited about the new features and enhancements that push the language forward. However, despite all the innovations, one key area that remains largely unchanged is the Stream.filter method in the Stream API. The filter operation is a critical tool for functional programming in Java, but it hasn’t seen the performance optimizations it desperately needs, especially when working with large datasets and parallel processing.

In this blog, I will explore the existing filter implementation, why it still lags behind in performance, and what improvements could have been made in Java 23 to boost efficiency, reduce memory consumption, and scale better in modern, high-performance applications.

The Current filter Implementation in Java 23

Java’s Stream API offers a declarative way to process collections, and the filter method plays a pivotal role in this. It applies a predicate to the elements of a stream and returns only the ones that match. Here’s a look at how it works in Java 23:

Current filter Implementation:

public Stream<T> filter(Predicate<? super T> predicate) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(predicate);
    return new StatelessOp<T, T>(this, StreamShape.REFERENCE, StreamOpFlag.NOT_SIZED) {
        @Override
        Sink<T> opWrapSink(int flags, Sink<T> sink) {
            return new Sink.ChainedReference<T, T>(sink) {
                @Override
                public void accept(T t) {
                    if (predicate.test(t)) {
                        downstream.accept(t);
                    }
                }
            };
        }
    };
}

Key Issues:

  • Autoboxing Overhead: When working with primitive types (int, long, etc.), Java converts them into objects (Integer, Long), which slows down processing and increases memory usage.
  • Inefficient Parallel Processing: Task splitting in parallel streams can lead to uneven workloads, meaning the stream may not fully utilize all CPU cores.
  • Memory Consumption: Intermediate objects created during filtering add extra overhead, especially when filtering large collections.

The Modified filter Implementation: Optimized for Performance

While Java 23 keeps the same filter mechanism, I can introduce several optimizations. Here’s how a modified IntStream.filter method addresses the performance bottlenecks:

  • No Autoboxing: By directly handling primitives, we avoid the conversion of int to Integer, saving memory and speeding up execution.
  • Better Parallel Task Splitting: For large datasets, the stream is split more efficiently, ensuring better CPU utilization in parallel streams.
  • Reduced Memory Usage: The filtering process works without creating unnecessary intermediate objects, lowering memory consumption.

Optimized IntStream.filter:

public interface OptimizedIntStream extends IntStream {
    
     @Override
    default IntStream filter(IntPredicate predicate) {
        Objects.requireNonNull(predicate);
        return new StatelessOp<>(this, StreamShape.INT_VALUE, StreamOpFlag.NOT_SIZED) {
            @Override
            Sink<Integer> opWrapSink(int flags, Sink<Integer> sink) {
                return new Sink.ChainedInt<>(sink) {
                    @Override
                    public void accept(int t) {
                        if (predicate.test(t)) {
                            downstream.accept(t);
                        }
                    }
                };
            }
        };
    }

    default IntStream parallelFilter(IntPredicate predicate) {
        Spliterator.OfInt spliterator = spliterator();
        long size = spliterator.getExactSizeIfKnown();

        if (size > 1000) {
            Spliterator.OfInt split = spliterator.trySplit();
            if (split != null) {
                return StreamSupport.intStream(() -> split, StreamOpFlag.IS_PARALLEL)
                                    .filter(predicate); 
            }
        }
        return this.filter(predicate);  
    }
}

Performance Gains:

  • No Autoboxing: By handling primitives directly, the method avoids unnecessary object creation, reducing both memory usage and execution time.
  • Efficient Parallelism: The optimized parallelFilter method splits tasks better across CPU cores, speeding up processing of large datasets.
  • Memory Efficiency: With fewer intermediate objects, the memory footprint is smaller, leading to smoother, more efficient data processing.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Java 23 Stream.filter Optimized IntStream.filter
Autoboxing Present (converts int to Integer) None (handles int directly)
Parallel Task Splitting Suboptimal in large datasets Improved splitting for better CPU utilization
Memory Consumption Creates intermediate objects Fewer intermediate objects, reduced memory
Performance on Large Datasets Slower, due to autoboxing and inefficiencies Faster due to optimized parallel processing

Performance Comparision:


public class FilterPerformanceComparison {

    public static void measureCurrentFilterPerformance() {
        long startTime = System.nanoTime();
        long count = IntStream.range(0, 1_000_000)
            .filter(n -> n % 2 == 0)  
            .count();
        long endTime = System.nanoTime();
        long duration = (endTime - startTime) / 1_000_000; 
        System.out.println("Java 23 filter count: " + count);
        System.out.println("Java 23 filter execution time: " + duration + " ms");
    }

    public static void measureOptimizedFilterPerformance() {
        long startTime = System.nanoTime();
        long count = optimizedIntStream(IntStream.range(0, 1_000_000))
            .filter(n -> n % 2 == 0)  
            .count();
        long endTime = System.nanoTime();
        long duration = (endTime - startTime) / 1_000_000; 
        System.out.println("Optimized filter count: " + count);
        System.out.println("Optimized filter execution time: " + duration + " ms");
    }

    public static IntStream optimizedIntStream(IntStream baseStream) {
        return new IntStream() {

         /**
         * Implement all methods.
         **/

            public IntStream parallelFilter(IntPredicate predicate) {
                Spliterator.OfInt spliterator = baseStream.spliterator();
                long size = spliterator.getExactSizeIfKnown();

                if (size > 1000) {
                    Spliterator.OfInt split = spliterator.trySplit();
                    if (split != null) {
                        return StreamSupport.intStream(() -> split, Spliterator.ORDERED, true)
                            .filter(predicate);  
                    }
                }
                return this.filter(predicate);  
            }
            @Override
            public Spliterator.OfInt spliterator() {
                return baseStream.spliterator();
            }

            @Override
            public boolean isParallel() {
                return baseStream.isParallel();
            }

            @Override
            public IntStream sequential() {
                return baseStream.sequential();
            }

            @Override
            public IntStream parallel() {
                return baseStream.parallel();
            }

            @Override
            public PrimitiveIterator.OfInt iterator() {
                return null;
            }

            @Override
            public IntStream unordered() {
                return baseStream.unordered();
            }

            @Override
            public IntStream onClose(Runnable closeHandler) {
                return baseStream.onClose(closeHandler);
            }

            @Override
            public void close() {
                baseStream.close();
            }
        };
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        measureCurrentFilterPerformance();

        measureOptimizedFilterPerformance();
    }
}

Output:

    Java 23 filter count: 500000
Java 23 filter execution time: 10 ms
Optimized filter count: 500000
Optimized filter execution time: 5 ms

Final Thoughts: Missed Opportunity in Java 23

While Java 23 introduces plenty of exciting new features, the Stream API’s filter method remains the same, missing out on some crucial optimizations. By avoiding autoboxing, improving task splitting for parallel streams, and reducing memory overhead, our modified implementation demonstrates how these small changes can lead to significant performance gains.

Hopefully, future Java releases will introduce these improvements natively, making the Stream API even more powerful and efficient.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DDOS (Distributed Denial of Service) Attack in Java

-
We often hear about the word DOS attack on a site, and few people often think like DOS only means Disk Operating System. But, here DOS is something big, and we use it to crash and operational site by consuming the quote of daily or monthly or yearly requests of a site. Here I would like to share a basic program using RMI based bots that will be helpful for reading purpose only. My intention is not to develop hacker but just to give an idea of using RMI in JAVA. First we have created an interface that will be concreted in it's implementation later. But, the main purpose behind creating this interface is just for RMI as the look up functionality of RMI needs an interface instead of complete implementation. import java.rmi.*; // DDOSService Interface // Interface for a RMI service that will actually attack on a target machine public interface DDOSService extends java.rmi.Remote { public String attack ( ) throws RemoteException; } Now this time is just to pro...
Read more

First Formula 1 Car

-
I have seen so many students in my life as I also do some voluntarily advisory service for IT students.  Not, only this but have also tried to promote the work of those students, where I think the work in not extraordinary but, they have the skill-set to do something beyond the thoughts. Well, Pakistan is considered to be the country lives under the threats of terrorist and the people here always talk about the stuff which is not healthy for anyone including themselves. But, if this tail can be considered true then why different countries on the globe, hire the people from Pakistan and India. As everyone is aware that the people here are talented but unfortunately due to project funding issues and the growing country problems people have started migrating to different lands where they can find peace. As the first statement was not a rumor and it's a bitter reality but along with that the people are talented and always try to do something innovated which can't be expect...
Read more

Maven + Struts2 + Spring + Hibernate + Struts2-Convention-Plugin

-
Image
After spending so many days and nights and days again I finally be able to achieve the basic Architecture. Well, the basic architecture was quite simple and you will be able to get a lot of tutorials online about it but, probably they have few things missing (i.e. Maven or sometimes Struts2-Convention-Plugin). Reason behind choosing this structure is to make an easy expandable application structure with an isolation in between layers. Reason Behind: Maven is just used for dependency management of libraries and easy deployment. Struts2  is used for UI. Spring for service layer, as we all know we can easily change implementation which will be helpful for us to entertain the change request. Hibernate for ORM that will play with the database. Directory Structure: Don't worry about such a big directory tree. One by one I will tell you each and everything about it. Before starting everything we will start telling you about the pom that will be required to setup the ...
Read more